Charles Naggar

Professional Profile

Charles Naggar is a counsel at Ruttenberg IP Law. Mr. Naggar’s practice touches on all aspects of intellectual property law. His experience includes patent, copyright, trademark, trade secret, and false advertising litigation. Mr. Naggar comes to Ruttenberg IP Law with several years of litigation experience from two major law firms and industry experience as a former chemical engineer.

If you would like to reach Charles Naggar directly, please email him at charels@ruttenbergiplaw.com.

Education

Suffolk University Law School, J.D., 2015

Summa cum laude
Dean’s List (all semesters)
National Intellectual Property Moot Court

Northeastern University, B.S., Chemical Engineering, 2010

summa cum laude

Prior Experience

Kasowitz LLP, New York, New York, Jan. 2021 – Aug. 2025
Alston & Bird LLP, New York, New York, Sept. 2015 – Dec. 2020

Admissions/Qualifications

- New York
- Southern District of New York
- Eastern District of New York
- Federal Circuit

Representative Experience

LG v. Intellectual Ventures
Successfully defended Intellectual Ventures against claims of breach of patent license agreement. Damages were significantly reduced after trial.

Intellectual Ventures v. Honda, Tesla, GM, and Toyota
Represented Intellectual Ventures in several patent infringement lawsuits against automobile manufacturers. The patents at issue related to automobile connectivity, communication, and data processing. Favorably settled cases shortly after claim construction.

Truinject Corp. v. Galderma S.A.
Represented Truinject in patent and trademark litigation related to Botox injection training.

Brazos Licensing v. Canon
Represented Brazos in patent infringement litigation related to camera and video patents.

Brazos Licensing v. Netgear
Represented Brazos in patent infringement litigation related to Wi-Fi technology.

Brazos Licensing v. F5 Inc.
Represented Brazos in several patent cases related to wireless communication networks.

Brazos v. ZTE
Represented Brazos in a dozen patent lawsuits. The patented technology involved data processing, mobile communication, and wireless transmission. Achieved highly favorable settlement after expert discovery.

XR Communications LLC v. ASUSTeK Computer Inc.
Defended ASUSTeK against accusations of patent infringement of patents related to wireless communication. Case settled favorably.

Pharmacyclics LLC v. Zydus Worldwide DMCC
Defended pharmaceutical manufacturer, Zydus, against claims of patent infringement related to its production of cancer drug, ibrutinib.

Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Corporation v. Zydus Pharmaceutical
Defended pharmaceutical manufacturer, Zydus, against claims of patent infringement related to its production of diabetes drug, canagliflozin.

Neodron, Ltd. v. Dell Technologies Inc.
Defended Dell against accusations of patent infringement in simultaneous litigation before the ITC and District Court. Cases settled favorably.

EFX Marketing, LLC v. New Twist Food, LLC
Represented EFX in asserting trade dress, patent infringement, and trademark against competitor. Case settled favorably with complete removal of competing products.

Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Mylan
Defended Mylan in a patent infringement lawsuit related to its manufacture of diabetes drug, linagliptin. Secured non-infringement and invalidity verdicts at trial.

Eli Lilly and Company et al v. Mylan
Brought an IPR seeking to invalidate patent related to the administration of cancer drug, pemetrexed.

Brought an IPR seeking to invalidate patent related to the administration of cancer drug, pemetrexed.

Represented Mylan in an IPR related to antiplatelet medication, prasugrel.

Forest Laboratories v. Mylan
Defended Mylan in patent infringement lawsuit related to fibromyalgia treatment, milnacipran. Successfully settled case while on appeal.